Stratigraphically significant early Late Ordovivian conodonts from the Tsagaan Del Formation, Bayankhongor area, Central Mongolia
Guillermo L. Albanesi1, Chulun Minjin2 and Jalbaa Undarya2
1 CONICET – Museo de Paleontología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Casilla de Correo 1598, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina. E–mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
2 School of Geology, Mongolian Technical University, Ulaanbataar, Mongolia. E–mail: email@example.com
Key words: Conodonts. Biostratigraphy. Late Ordovician. Tsagaan Del Formation. Mongolia.
During a field trip to southern Mongolia organized by IGCP project 410 (IUGS–UNESCO), "The Great Ordovician Biodiversity Event", in August–September 2001, the authors were led to examine the best available stratigraphic sections and their accompanying Lower Paleozoic biotas. One of the most interesting visited sites was the Tsagaan Del area (Figure 1), where macrofossils and carbonate samples for conodonts were collected in order to get a more accurate biostratigraphy for the Tsagaan Del Formation.
The Tsagaan Del Formation
One of the most complete fossiliferous sections of the Upper Ordovician in Mongolia is exposed in the Tsagaan Del area. This significant section is located ca. 40 km west of Bayankhongor City in Central Mongolia (Figure 1). The Tsagaan Del Section was discovered by German geologist D. Andres and colleagues during a geological survey in 1960. On the basis of the registered fauna, which includes trilobites, brachiopods, gastropods, corals, and conodonts, a Silurian age was originally assigned to the section (Blagonravov, 1973). In 1974, Kh.S. Rozman and Ch. Minjin began to study some of the invertebrate fossil groups; in particular, the brachiopods and corals, and proposed a preliminary biostratigraphy for the Tsagaan Del Section (Bondarenko and Minjin, 1977; Rozman and Minjin, 1981; Bondarenko et al., 1981; Bondarenko, 2002). The Rugosa and Stromatoporoidea, were also studied by Bolshakova and Ulitina (1985), and the bryozoans by Kopaevich (1984). The first record of a conodont form–species from the Tsagaan Del Formation, Icriodella irregularis, was in the book "Geology of Mongolian People Republic" (Blagonravov, 1973). A conodont assemblage including Icriodella superba, Panderodus compressus, Oistodus cf. inclinatus, Belodina sp., and Paltodus sp., recovered from bed 7 of the formation, was determined by Moskalenko (1981), while Panderodus gracilis and Erismodus sp. from bed 6 of same unit were determined by S.V. Dubinina (unpublished). Although these faunas are Late Ordovician in age, the absence of key species precluded a precise age determination. Subsequently, an Ashgill age was given from the associated macrofauna (Minjin and Undarya, 2001) (Figure 3).
Figure 1. Location and schematic geological map of the Tsagaan Del area.
Figure 2. Conodonts from bed 6 of the Tsagaan Del Formation.
As result of the first geological mapping of Mongolia, seven isolated outcrops of the Tsagaan Del Formation were recognized in tectonic blocks of the Bayankhongor suture zone (Blagonravov, 1973). The type section of the Tsagaan Del Formation is located within that suture zone, where outcops show west–east strike, have an almost vertical dip, and are ca. 5 km in length. These outcrops are mostly represented by red sandstones, continental conglomerate facies, and basalts. To date, only two localities, Tsagaan Del and Melden Teeg (= Tsul Tskhir), have yielded fossil remains. At Melden Teeg, fossils are rare and have been less thoroughly studied than those from Tsagaan Del, although a list of registered forms includes a similar fauna to the present one from white–grayish limestones.
Seven beds can be recognized in the Tsagaan Del Formation (Figures 1, 3) following descriptions by Minjin and Undarya (2001). Bed 6, 20–25 m in thickness, which yielded the conodont fauna described below, is characterized by gray–brownish argillaceous limestones, with rich and well–preserved fossils, including rugosans, tabulates, heliolitoids, stromatoporoids, bryozans, brachiopods, trilobites, crinoids, and conodonts. Regional correlation of the Tsagaan Del Formation allows two regional stages to be distinguished in Mongolia; i.e., Bayankhongor (Caradoc – Lower Ashgill) and Khangai (Middle Ashgill) (Bondarenko et al., 1981).
One carbonate sample (ca. 2.5 kg) from Bed 6 of the Tsagaan Del Formation, was completely digested by conventional acid etching techniques (10% acetic acid) in search of conodonts. Insoluble residues yielded 59 conodont specimens that belong to four species: Amorphognathus tvaerensis Bergström, Icriodella superba Rhodes, Panderodus gracilis Branson and Mehl, and Panderodus serratus Rexroad (Figure 2). The multielement apparatuses of the four taxa have been fully described by previous authors, and only comments on the taxonomy of the species are herein included. Recovered conodonts show Conodont Alteration Index 1.5, which indicates overburden temperatures lower than 90 ºC (Epstein et al., 1977). Specimens are housed at the Museum of Paleontology of the National University of Córdoba, Argentina, under code CORD–MP. Following review on taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and paleoenvironmental meaning of represented species considers original and most recent studies.
Amorphognathus tvaerensisBergström, 1962
Figure 2: 5a,b
Material: 3 elements (1M, 1Sa, 1Sb).
Remarks: The apparatus of Amorphognathus tvaerensis was originally reconstructed by Bergström (1971) to include Pa, Pb, M, Sa, Sb, Sc, Sd elements of typical balognathid morphology. Recently, Dzik (1994) described ontogenetic variations in the species, phylogenetic relationships with other closely related taxa, and migratory patterns for the cold–water Mediterranean Province (cf., Bergström, 1983). A. tvaerensis most commonly occurs in deep–cold water biofacies like those described for the Las Plantas Formation in the Argentine Precordillera (Albanesi, 1998).
The A. tvaerensis Zone, reference for the early Upper Ordovician of the Atlantic Realm, was originally defined by Bergström (1971) from the Dalby Limestone, Fjäcka section of Dalarna, in Central Sweden. In the type area, the key species occurs in rocks characterized by the presence of graptolites from the upper part of the Nemagraptus gracilis Zone and the lower part of the Diplograptus multidens Zone. These units correspond to the lower portion of the Caradoc British Series; i.e., the lower (yet not nominated) Stage of the global Upper Ordovician Series (Bergström et al., 2000).
Icriodella superbaRhodes, 1953
Figure 2: 1–4, 10
Material: 48 elements (38 Pa, 8 Pb, 1Sa, 1Sb).
Remarks: This species bears at least five different morphotypes (Pa, Pb, M, Sa, Sb) in its multielement apparatus (Sweet, 1988), which was originally reconstructed by Bergström and Sweet (1966) from the Lexington Limestone of Kentucky, and lateral equivalents in Ohio and Indiana, North America. Icriodella superba is a well–known taxon from late Mohowkian through early Cincinnatian strata in North America (e.g., Leslie, 2000), and from early Caradoc through early Ashgill rocks in Europe (e.g., Savage and Bassett, 1985). The first appearance of I. superba occurs just above the base of the Upper Ordovician global Series (FAD of Nemagraptus gracilis, Bergström et al., 2000), and its range continues up to pre–Hirnantian levels.
This species is widely distributed in the warm–shallow waters of the Midcontinent conodont Realm; in particular, the Cincinnati Region of North America, but it is more commonly associated with genera that are abundantly represented in deeper–water facies, such as Amorphognathus, Rhodesognathus, Periodon, and Panderodus (Sweet, 1988). I. superba was also documented for shallow–shelf environments from temperate domains of the Welsh Borderland and other localities of Europe (Savage and Bassett, 1985).
Panderodus gracilis (Branson and Mehl, 1933)
Figure 2: 8, 9
Figure 3. Vertical distribution of taxa in the Tsagaan Del Formation. Bayankhongor suture zone, Central Mongolia.
Material: 6 elements.
Remarks: This long–ranging coniform species has a complex apparatus that has challenged several authors who have attempted its reconstruction due to the simplicity and plasticity of the morphotypes. After a first attempt by Bergström and Sweet (1966), a fairly complete overview regarding the apparatus reconstruction was provided by Sansom et al., (1994), who described and illustrated an apparatus–based taxonomy of Panderodus in great detail.
Panderodus serratusRexroad, 1967
Figure 2: 6, 7
Material: 2 elements.
Remarks: Posteriorly serrated elements characterize this species, which has been described most frequently in form–taxonomy. This is due to its recurrent appearance through time, and the variable development of small denticles in the posterior margin of the non–geniculate simple cones that characterize the apparatus. Some authors (Nowlan et al., 1988) argue the possibility that the form–species P. serratus represents ecophenotypic variations of Panderodus gracilis. Both these apparently pelagic species have extensive vertical and horizontal distributions, and are commonly found together in diverse environments.
The presence of Amorphognathus tvaerensis Bergström in Bed 6 of the Tsagaan Del Formation at Bayankhongor suture zone, Central Mongolia, indicates an Early Caradoc age (early Late Ordovician). This new record allows us to revise the preliminary age assignment based on the macrofauna. The conodont assemblage suggests a relatively shallow–water shelfal environment of deposition in low latitude domains.
The authors thank to Drs. E. Serpagli, R. Aldridge and G. Sarmiento for reviewing present contribution, and acknowledge support given by IGCP project 410, IUGS–UNESCO.
Albanesi, G.L. 1998. Biofacies de conodontes de las secuencias ordovícicas del cerro Potrerillo, Precordillera Central de San Juan, R. Argentina. Actas XII Academia Nacional de Ciencias, Córdoba: 75–98.
Bergström, S.M. 1962. Conodonts from the Ludibundus limestone (Middle Ordovician) of the Tvären area (S. E. Sweden). Arkiv f. Mineralogi o. Geologi, 3 (1): 1–61.
Bergström, S.M. 1971. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Middle and Upper Ordovician of Europe and eastern North America. In: Sweet, W.C. and Bergström, S.M. (Eds.), Symposium on conodont biostratigraphy. Geological Society of America Memory, 127: 83–161.
Bergström, S.M. 1983. Biogeography, evolutionary relationships, and biostratigraphic significance of Ordovician platform conodonts. Fossils and Strata, 15: 35–58.
Bergström, S.M., Finney, S.C., Chen Xu, Pälsson, C., Wang Zhi–hao and Yngve Grahn. 2000. A proposed global boundary stratotype for the base of the Upper Series of the Ordovician System: The Fagelsang section, Scania, southern Sweden. Episodes, 23 (3): 102–109.
Bergström, S.M. and Sweet, W.C. 1966. Conodonts from the Lexington Limestone (Middle Ordovician) of Kentucky and its equivalents in Ohio and Indian. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 50 (229): 271–441.
Blagonravov, V.A. 1973. The Ordovician System. Bayankhongor suture zone. In: Geology of Mongolian People Republic, 1: 121–122 (in Russian).
Bolshakova, L.N. and Ulitina, L.M. 1985. Stromatoporates and Biostratigraphy of the Lower Paleozoic in Mongolia. Transsec. Joint Soviet–Mongolian Paleontological Expedition, vol. 27, Nauka Press, Moscow (in Russian).
Bondarenko, O.B. 2002. Paleoecological and Paleozoogeographic analysis of Ordovician corals – Heliolitoids of Mongolia. Paleontological Journal, 3: 21–30 (in Russian).
Bondarenko, O.B. and Minjin, Ch. 1977. Morphology and astogeny of some corals from Bayankhongor area (Central Mongolia). In: Paleozoic invertebrates of Mongolia, Nauka Press, Moscow: 20–31 (in Russian).
Bondarenko, O.B., Minjin, Ch., Moskalenko, T. and Rozman Kh.S. 1981. Analysis of the fauna and correlation of sections. In: Atlas of Ordovician faunas of Mongolia. Transactions of Geology Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 354: 38–63 (in Russian).
Branson, E.B. and Mehl, M.G. 1933. Conodont studies Nº. 2: Conodonts from the Joachim (Middle Ordovician) of Missouri; a study of Hinde´s types of conodonts preserved in the British Museum. University of Missouri Studies, 8: 77–167.
Dzik, J. 1994. Conodonts of the Mójcza Limestone. In: Dzik, J., Olempska, E. and Pisera, A. (Eds.), Ordovician carbonate platform ecosystem of the Holy Cross Mountains. Palaeontologia Polonica, 53: 43–128.
Epstein, A.G., Epstein, J.B. and Harris, L.D. 1977. Conodont color alteration – An index to organic metamorphism. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 995: 1–27.
Kopaevich, G.V. 1984. Atlas of Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian Bryozoans of Mongolia. Joint Soviet–Mongolian Paleontological Expedition, vol. 22. Nauka Press, Moscow.
Leslie, S.A. 2000. Mohawkian (Upper Ordovician) conodonts of Eastern North America and Baltoscandia. Journal of Paleontology, 74 (6): 1122–1147.
Minjin, Ch. and Undarya, J. 2001 Tsagaan Del area description. In: The Guidebook for the Joint field meeting of IGCP410–IGCP421 in Mongolia (second edition), Ulaanbaatar: 84–87.
Moskalenko, T.A. 1981. Upper Ordovician Conodonts of Mongolia. In: Atlas of Ordovician fauna of Mongolia. Transactions of Geology Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 354: 191–194 (in Russian).
Nowlan, G.S., McCracken, A.D. and Chatterton, B.D.E. 1988. Conodonts from Ordovician–Silurian strata, Whittaker Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin, 373: 1–99.
Rexroad, C.B. 1967. Stratigraphy and condont paleontology of the Brassfield (Silurian) at Lithium, Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 45: 684–703.
Rhodes, F.H.T. 1953. Some British Lower Paleozoic conodont faunas. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 647: 261–334.
Rozman, Kh.S. and Minjin, Ch. 1981. Upper Ordovician deposits of Mongolia, Bayankhongor suture zone. In: Atlas of Ordovician fauna of Mongolia. Transactions of Geology Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 354: 32–34 (in Russian).
Sansom, I.J., Armstrong, H.A. and Smith, M.P. 1994. The apparatus architecture of Panderodus and its implications for coniform conodont classification. Palaeontology, 37 (4): 781–799.
Savage, N.M. and Bassett, M.G. 1985. Caradoc–Ashgill conodont faunas from Wales and the Welsh borderland. Palaeontology, 28 (4): 679–713.
Sweet, W.C. 1988. The Conodonta: Morphology, taxonomy, paleoecology and evolutionary history of a long–extinct animal phylum. Oxford Press: 1–169.
Received: February 15, 2003
Accepted: June 15, 2003